Key Points
- Entain’s research identified 11 Premier League clubs holding unlicensed gambling arrangements, three more than the government’s own estimate of eight.
- UK black-market gambling stakes are forecast to nearly double from £17 billion in 2025 to over £33 billion by 2028, according to H2 Gambling Capital data cited by the Betting and Gaming Council.
- Entain CEO Stella David says clubs that signed new deals “knew the risks” and has called for the ban to take effect immediately, even if clubs must order replacement kits mid-season.
Eleven Clubs, Three More Than the Government Counted
The DCMS consultation on banning unlicensed gambling sponsorship, which ran from 15 July to 9 September 2026, was designed to sharpen the government’s picture of how deep the problem runs. Entain’s response to that consultation suggests the picture was blurrier than ministers had realised. The government’s own working estimate put the number of Premier League clubs with unlicensed gambling arrangements at around eight during the 2025-26 season; Entain’s own research now puts that figure at 11 out of 20 clubs in the current campaign. That is over half the top flight operating with sponsors who carry no obligation to follow UK player protection or anti-money laundering rules.
The deals span sleeve sponsorships, training kits and stadium branding. Sunderland announced crypto casino and sportsbook Shuffle as its official sleeve partner just last week, under a multi-year agreement. Shuffle holds no UK gambling licence. Stake continues to appear on Everton’s kit despite having withdrawn from the UK market in 2025 amid a Gambling Commission investigation into its advertising. Chelsea carries 8XBet branding, Tottenham Hotspur is linked to VSBet, and Nottingham Forest to FUN88. Under the current legal framework, these arrangements can remain lawful provided the operators’ services are inaccessible to UK consumers, typically enforced through geo-blocking. The practical weakness in that position is a standard VPN.
A Shirt Ban With a Very Large Side Door
Premier League clubs voluntarily stopped placing gambling brands on the front of shirts from the start of the 2026-27 campaign. That commitment left sleeves, training kits, pitch-side boards and venue branding entirely open. The shirt ban generated real headlines; the rest of the kit was left to market forces. What those market forces produced is a straightforward shift of unlicensed branding from the front of shirts to every other surface available.
However, this issue goes further than the season that is now over. The license of TGP Europe was revoked by the Gambling Commission in May 2025 because it was discovered that the company had not done enough due diligence on its business partners and was non-compliant with anti-money laundering regulations. TGP Europe provided the white label solution to some foreign gambling brands that also had the sponsorship and advertising deals with Premier League teams. As a result of the revocation, these foreign companies have become unlicensed in Great Britain and, as is acknowledged by the government in its consultation document, created a legislative loophole that would still be available to them as long as they did not allow British customers to access their websites.
The Government’s Preferred Date Is August 2027, and Entain Thinks That Is Too Late
DCMS has indicated that its preferred proposed implementation date for a full ban is August 2027, ahead of the 2027-28 football season, though no legislation has yet been enacted and the government confirmed it will review consultation responses before bringing any measures before Parliament. Entain’s position is that this timeline is not good enough. It gives unlicensed operators another full Premier League season to retain their presence in British sport, collect brand exposure through global broadcasts, and reach consumers who may not realise the operator behind the logo is unregulated.
Stella David, Entain’s CEO, made the argument directly: “Premier League clubs that have struck new deals with unlicensed gambling operators knew the risks. The government made clear in February that it would bring in a ban and it should do so immediately: even if that means clubs ordering new kit mid-season. Inconvenience is not an excuse for inaction.”
That point about clubs knowing the risks is specific and deliberate. Sunderland’s Shuffle deal and Everton’s continued Stake arrangement were both signed or maintained after the government had publicly flagged its intention to legislate in February 2026. The commercial decisions were made with full awareness that a ban was coming. Entain’s argument is that this removes any reasonable claim of surprise from the clubs involved.
Black Market Stakes Forecast to Nearly Double While Legislation Is Drafted
The consumer risk behind Entain’s urgency is not abstract. H2 Gambling Capital forecasts, cited by the Betting and Gaming Council, put UK black-market gambling stakes at £17 billion in 2025, rising to over £33 billion by 2028. Unlicensed operators are under no obligation to run affordability checks, honour self-exclusion registrations, or meet the Gambling Commission’s anti-money laundering reporting requirements. Consumers who land on these platforms through a Premier League sleeve sponsor may receive none of the protections that UK-licensed gambling requires by law.
The route by which consumers reach those operators is now documented. Evidence submitted to the DCMS consultation showed that 22% of UK consumers who use unlicensed platforms first encountered them through social media, while 13% did so through sponsorship. Entain’s response to the consultation argues the proposed ban should be extended to cover online and digital advertising on that basis. That extension, however, is outside the scope of the current secondary legislation proposal; the DCMS consultation document confirms that any ban on online advertising would require separate primary legislation.
Eight in Ten Consumers Cannot Tell Who They Are Betting With
Entain’s consumer confusion research found that over 80% of people could not confidently distinguish between a licensed and an unlicensed gambling brand. When an unlicensed operator’s logo sits on the sleeve of a Premier League shirt broadcast to a global audience, the brand gains the implicit association of a legitimate, regulated business, even where its services remain technically restricted to UK consumers. The 80% figure, combined with the 13% sponsorship discovery rate from the consultation, forms the core of the case for treating physical sponsorship as a meaningful pathway to unlicensed gambling rather than a passive branding exercise.
Expert Analysis
We should say what the Entain press release carefully does not. Licensed operators, including Ladbrokes and Coral’s parent company, are not pushing for tighter regulation purely out of concern for vulnerable consumers. Offshore platforms pay no UK taxes, carry none of the compliance overhead that the Gambling Commission’s Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice impose, and compete directly with regulated operators while operating outside the rules those operators must follow. The commercial incentive to close the loophole is real, and it runs alongside the consumer protection argument, not instead of it.
The structural issue, though, sits beneath the sponsorship debate entirely. TGP Europe’s licence collapse in May 2025 showed how quickly the line between licensed and unlicensed advertising can dissolve when a single white-label provider fails. The consultation document itself acknowledges that the legislative gap was not anticipated when the original framework was designed and only became visible as overseas operators found the white-label route into Premier League advertising. A ban dated to August 2027 addresses the most visible symptom of that design flaw. It does not close the white-label route itself, nor does it address the VPN circumvention that already undermines geo-blocking as an enforcement mechanism. Entain is right that the August 2027 timeline is slow. The harder question is whether a ban on physical sponsorship alone, whenever it arrives, is the right boundary to draw.
Share
5 views
