Key Points
- Entain soft-launched BlackRush Casino and FoxySpins under a Gibraltar licence the day after New Zealand’s 29 September auction began, signalling market intent before any licence has been granted.
- According to Entain’s CFO Rob Wood, New Zealand’s online casino market size is approximately £600m per annum in the FY25 earnings call, but Entain’s revenue from this region is under £200m.
- TAB NZ enjoys the statutory monopoly in relation to sports and horse racing betting in New Zealand, while Entain runs that business in the country under a 25-year partnership agreement, which makes its cross-selling proposition unique for any other casino-only bidder.
Entain has surfaced BlackRush Casino in New Zealand just as the country’s first online casino licensing auction began, and the timing raises a question every other operator in the room is probably sitting with: how much of this market was already lined up before anyone placed a bid?
BlackRush Surfaces as New Zealand’s Casino Licence Auction Begins
The site became publicly visible on 30 September, reported by NEXT.io one day after the Department of Internal Affairs began the auction on 29 September for the right to apply for one of 15 available online casino licences. BlackRush operates under Entain’s ElectraWorks Gibraltar licence, with Gibraltar’s gambling regulator listing ElectraWorks as part of Entain Group. The site requires a New Zealand VPN to access, meaning it is not yet operating under a New Zealand licence. Industry reporting shows it appears to run on a separate platform from Entain’s global stack, shared with FoxySpins, a second New Zealand-facing brand drawing on the company’s existing FoxyBingo identity. Both brands would sit alongside betcha and TAB, Entain’s established local sports betting operations.
BlackRush Is Not Yet a New Zealand-Licensed Casino
The significance of the launch aside, there are clear statements that need to be made.
The Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 took effect on 1 May, thus introducing the first-ever New Zealand licensing system for online casino operators. Prior to this date, New Zealand citizens had access to offshore websites that would not be regulated in New Zealand. The newly established system will ensure that operators undertake age verification, set limits for deposits and money spent, offer self-exclusion mechanisms, and develop a complaints process, none of which was mandatory under New Zealand law.
A winning bid does not mean a licence is awarded. Successful applicants have to go through a licensing process before receiving the permit. According to the Department of Internal Affairs, the applications for licences will begin in October 2026; the market is expected to start functioning within the year 2027. A separate licence is given for each brand, with no operator being allowed to obtain more than three of them. Licences have a validity period of three years initially with one potential renewal period of five years. Operators not applying for a licence cannot operate in New Zealand after 1 December 2026, while those who are going to apply will be allowed to work without promotion.
What Entain Has Said About Its Three-Licence Strategy?
Entain has been openly targeting the maximum three licences a single operator can hold. During the FY25 earnings call, chief executive Stella David addressed the cross-sell opportunity directly. “I think the opportunity for us is significant because we’ll be the only player who will be able to do cross-sell,” she said. Entain CFO Rob Wood put the total market at around £600m annually, noting the company currently generates less than £200m in the region and asking rhetorically whether adding casino brands could push that figure to £300m, framing it as a hypothetical opportunity rather than a projected target.
BlackRush could be one of those three brands, but Entain has not publicly confirmed which brands it will submit for licensing. What is harder to dismiss is the operational groundwork already in place. 15M found BlackRush registered in New Zealand’s public WebSMS shortcode directory with its own SMS number, code 8614, sitting alongside existing Entain entries for betcha and TAB NZ. No promotional messages have been sent, but local messaging infrastructure is not typically provisioned for brands that are not being seriously prepared for a market.
Why Entain’s TAB NZ Position Matters
This is the detail that separates Entain from every other bidder in the auction.
TAB NZ holds the statutory exclusivity over online sports and racing betting in New Zealand; Entain operates TAB NZ’s betting business under a 25-year strategic partnership. No other operator entering the casino licence auction can legally offer New Zealand sports betting, which means no other bidder can deliver the cross-sell David described from day one. Andrew Vouris, CEO of Entain Australia and New Zealand, confirmed in March 2026 that the company was chasing all three licences, saying Entain would be “the only operator in the market that’s able to offer sports, racing and potentially casino.” Other operators reportedly interested in New Zealand licences include SkyCity, Super Group, DigiPlus, Stake and Dabble, none of whom have publicly confirmed formal applications.
The Advertising Risk Entain Has Already Flagged
Not every signal from Entain ahead of the market opening has been about opportunity.
At the CiG iDEA Summit held in Manila last September, Andrew Hannan, the Director of Industry and External Affairs for Entain, stated that having fifteen brands vying for a market that has been recently legalised may result in an ad war and, in turn, tougher regulations. This is because of Entain’s experience of Entain through TAB NZ where intense advertising resulted in being criticised publicly, thus forcing Entain to adopt better-targeted advertising. In addition, New Zealand had implemented strict advertising regulations in the form of bans on sponsorships, affiliate marketing, and celebrity endorsements for licensed operators, and even broadcast restrictions during live sporting events. Moreover, Hannan has also mentioned that Entain will cooperate constructively with the DIA to ensure that any new regulations for casino advertising will not necessarily apply to sports and racing betting.
The risk Hannan described is grounded in documented regulatory history. A market opening with numerous brands advertising simultaneously to the same audience creates the kind of visible saturation that tends to produce political pressure fast, and that pattern played out in Australia before its own advertising reforms. Whether Entain’s position as the most recognised gambling brand in New Zealand makes this warning easier or harder to take at face value is a question readers can answer for themselves.
What BlackRush Does and Does Not Tell Us Yet?
The launch is best understood through what the evidence actually confirms rather than what it implies.
What is confirmed: BlackRush has surfaced for the New Zealand market, it operates under Entain’s Gibraltar regulatory structure, and it has its own SMS shortcode registered in New Zealand’s public directory. Entain has stated it intends to apply for three licences and believes its cross-sell position gives it a commercial advantage no other operator in the auction currently holds.
What is not confirmed: whether BlackRush is specifically one of the three brands Entain will nominate, which other brands it might nominate, and who ultimately receives a licence. New Zealand’s regulatory impact statement shows that in the 12 months to June 2025, the top 15 offshore entities subject to offshore gambling duty generated 99.8% of reported gross gambling revenue, with the top five producing 89.6% of that total. The 15-licence cap reflects where market demand already sits; the final allocation is still months from being settled.
Expert Analysis
The licensing regime in New Zealand has been designed with a specific regulatory aim in mind: to channel offshore activity into a domestic setting rather than liberalize the market. The DIA has been explicit that channeling is the goal, and the license cap, eligibility requirements and auction design have all been created with this end in mind. This is a consistent policy stance, but one which creates a pre-bid molded market.
Entain’s position that we find especially intriguing here is its dual position. As an applicant for licences, Entain is one of many. However, as the operating partner of TAB NZ, Entain is the only party that could lawfully link up sports betting clients with casino products once the market launches. Those are two very different types of advantage, and the present licensing system fails to make a distinction between them.
We do not claim that this system was crafted specifically for Entain. All that we are saying is that the combination of a concentrated existing market, statutory sports betting scheme unique to one operator, and an upper limit of three licences is such that Entain’s initial position differs materially from that of a newcomer. The interesting thing is not whether Entain enjoys that advantage, it certainly does. The real question is whether a proper competition can be fostered on its basis. The New Zealand gambling market will try answering this over the next few years.
Explore more:
Share
4 views
