Key Points
- Veikkaus bounced back into growth in Q1 2026 thanks to revenue of €471.3m and earnings of €234.2m, all achieved through online channels.
- The operator will owe around €1bn in a decade-long lottery license, which is payable on a heavily front-loaded basis in 2026.
- Finland’s channelisation rate has fallen from roughly 90% to approximately 50% over a decade, the structural collapse that made this entire reform inevitable.
A Recovery Story With A Very Large Asterisk
The Finnish government-run gambling company reported positive growth in its H1 2026 report, but behind the scenes, the numbers have a financial disclosure which many reports are brushing aside as an afterthought but which should really be grabbing the headlines. Veikkaus recorded sales revenues of €471.3 million in the first half of 2026, up by 1% from the €466.4 million recorded in H1 2025. Profits for the period amounted to €234.2 million, up by 2%. The recovery was significant in the context of the H1 2025 figures, which showed revenues down by 3.6%.
Digital Channels Carried The Entire Improvement
Physical gambling at Veikkaus is actively being reduced through design. Sales from slots and physical table games dropped to €63.4m from €71.3m, a result of the decrease in the number of both the retail outlets and the gaming devices. Lottery gambling, on the other hand, showed growth from €246.1m to €254.5m, partly due to the introduction of the Milli game in June 2025 and the rise in jackpots of the Lotto game. Digital channel sales now make up 64.5%, an increase of 3.6 percentage points year-on-year, while physical points of sale account for 35.5% of gross gaming revenue.
Betting and iCasino GGR grew by over 3% year-on-year from €146.5m to €151.6m. This segment will no longer be in the sole possession of Veikkaus starting 1 July 2027; therefore, the growth there is now doubly important, as it demonstrates the competitive capabilities of the operator in the segment it will soon compete with up to 50 other licensees.
The total number of registered customers was 2,672,000 as of the end of June, which was an increase of around 50,000 compared to one year ago. The Chief Executive Officer Olli Sarekoski commented as follows: “It’s really good to see that our investments are paying off.”
Fennica Gaming’s Surge That Most Competitors Missed
One detail sitting largely unreported is the performance of Fennica Gaming, Veikkaus’s international B2B subsidiary. Revenue jumped 80.6% year-on-year to €10.3m from €5.7m in H1 2025, with the company now operating across three continents in 21 markets and three game categories. During the half, Fennica launched eInstants and online casino games in Italy, Canada, two German states, Mexico, the Czech Republic and Iceland. For an operator that spent decades as a domestic-only monopoly, that international expansion is a genuinely new strategic layer, and one that provides revenue insulation as the home market opens to competition next year.
What €1bn Actually Buys, And Why The Timing Is Uncomfortable?
This is where things get really exciting. The company is set to give €1 billion in compensation for the exclusive right to operate a lottery in the market over a ten-year period starting in 2026, with a significant portion of it coming up in 2026. But the exact amount of what significant means is unknown.
Veikkaus generated €234.2m in profit across the whole of H1 2026. If the front-loaded portion of a billion-euro licence fee is material enough to land in a single financial year, the pressure on cash reserves becomes very real, even when the headline results look clean. The exclusivity covers lotteries, scratch cards, slot machines and physical table games. Online casino and sports betting, which generate the most competitive interest from incoming operators, sit outside the protected perimeter from July 2027.
The €1bn is not a regulatory fine or a punishment. It is a market-access fee the Finnish state charges Veikkaus for retaining protected revenue streams that no other operator can touch. The mechanism ensures that the economic value of the lottery monopoly flows into national accounts rather than sitting as a silent subsidy to the operator’s competitive ambitions elsewhere.
The Restructuring Goes Deeper Than A Headcount Change
On 2 September, Veikkaus opened change negotiations covering its Data and AI unit, with 15 positions planned to end and 17 new roles to be created. Reija Airas, EVP of people, culture and communications, was direct: “The new market situation requires us to be able to renew our capabilities and ways of working. What is essential in this change is that the focus and content of work will change: while some current roles are planned to end, more new roles are being created in terms of number.”
More structurally, Veikkaus has already split into two subsidiaries, one to manage exclusive lottery operations and one to compete under the open licence system. That structural separation is not cosmetic. Clean accounting between a protected monopoly entity and a market-facing competitor is a regulatory requirement, not a voluntary choice.
Veikkaus Joins The Association It Once Made Unnecessary
The same day the restructuring was announced, Veikkaus confirmed it will join Rahapeliala ry, the Gambling Industry Association of Finland, founded in 2022 when demonopolisation discussions began in earnest. The symbolism is considerable. For years, Veikkaus’s monopoly status meant there was no domestic gambling industry to speak of, because there was only one operator. Now it is joining the trade body alongside the competitors it will face in less than a year.
Sarekoski framed it simply: “It is a natural step for us to be involved in the industry’s advocacy together with other key operators. Cooperation is crucial for ensuring the functionality of the future system.” Mika Kuismanen, CEO of Rahapeliala ry, welcomed the membership: “Veikkaus is a significant operator in Finland, and its membership strengthens the representativeness and expertise of our industry advocacy.”
The Channelisation Number Behind The Entire Reform
Nothing illustrates more succinctly the rationale behind Finland’s decision to do away with its gambling monopoly than this: Finland’s current rate of digital channelisation is 50%, compared to about 90% a decade ago. The total GGR for Veikkaus in 2025 amounted to €931m, compared to €1.8bn in 2017. This means that the €900m difference in eight years is due to customers having moved from the regulated platform to offshore markets. Deputy CEO of Veikkaus, Velipekka Nummikoski estimates that the annual leakage due to this phenomenon is between €600m and €900m. The Finnish authorities are not deregulating their market out of a passion for liberalism. They are trying to reclaim revenues that are lost anyway.
The recently enacted Gambling Act of Finland, which was signed into law by President Alexander Stubb on 16 January 2026 following a parliamentary vote of 158 to nine in December 2025, introduces a competitive licensing regime from 1 July 2027 onwards, while maintaining Veikkaus’ lottery exclusivity through the €1bn compensation model. Approximately 50 companies have applied for licences by June 2026.
Expert Analysis: The Deal Looks Generous to Veikkaus, and That Deserves Scrutiny
The headline framing across most coverage treats the €1bn payment as a cost Veikkaus is bearing. We would argue the more honest reading is the opposite: Veikkaus is paying €1bn to lock out every competitor from Finland’s most stable and profitable gambling segment for a decade.
Consider what lottery exclusivity actually means in practice. Finland’s total estimated gambling GGR sits at €1.9bn, with lottery accounting for a substantial portion of that. Veikkaus retains that segment entirely. The 50-plus operators competing for licences are fighting over betting and iCasino rights only, segments that carry more volatility, higher acquisition costs and stricter advertising constraints under the new framework.
There is also a structural contradiction worth naming plainly. Veikkaus is now a member of Rahapeliala ry, sitting alongside competitors it will face in the open market. Yet its lottery revenue is completely shielded from those same competitors. The trade association gains credibility from Veikkaus’s membership. Veikkaus gains political legitimacy by appearing to participate in a shared industry conversation. Neither of those facts changes the underlying asymmetry.
Our deeper concern sits with the channelisation risk that regulators have not fully resolved. Finland’s proposed player protection thresholds are stricter than those of Germany and the Netherlands. Germany’s strict deposit limits produced channelisation rates of 20% to 40% for online slots. The Netherlands dropped below 50% after tightening player protection in late 2024. If Finland’s licensed market is too restrictive to compete with offshore alternatives, the €1bn paid for lottery exclusivity could look very expensive against a competitive market that never fully came home. That is the question the H1 results, for all their positivity, cannot answer.
Explore more:
Share
2 views
