Key Points
- The Frederiksberg Court blocked Polymarket and 97 other unlicensed sites on 8 July, enforced through DNS blocking by Danish internet providers.
- In February, Spillemyndigheden said it lacked grounds to act. By July, it had persuaded a court that Polymarket was actively targeting Danish users.
- The other countries that join France, the Netherlands, Spain, and Belgium in barring Polymarket in 2026 include Denmark.
In February 2026, Spillemyndigheden director Anders Dorph laid out the problem openly. Danish users were already accessing Polymarket and Kalshi, he confirmed, but the authority had no legal basis to block either platform. Simply being accessible to Danish users was not enough. Danish law requires clear evidence that an operator is actively targeting the Danish market, not just reachable from it.
Dorph was specific about what targeting looks like. “Prediction markets are already here, we see Polymarket and Kalshi,” he said. “We don’t have figures on how many people are using those sites but we will definitely block them if they target the Danish market, and use DNS blocking on their websites if we see any signs.” The requirements included either Danish language, local currency, Danish payment facilities, or gambling games revolving around Danish sporting events such as football tournaments which wouldn’t have been covered by mistake by any international gambling operator.
By 8 July, Spillemyndigheden managed to obtain enough evidence to bring the case before the Frederiksberg Court, winning the case in doing so. The Court found that Polymarket and a further 97 websites were engaged in gambling activity without an appropriate license in Denmark. Danish internet service providers now redirect any user attempting to access the blocked sites to a page stating that the website is illegal in Denmark.
The Case Was Filed Against Telenor, Not Polymarket
One detail most coverage missed: Spillemyndigheden’s lawsuit targeted telecommunications company Telenor, not Polymarket directly. Once the Frederiksberg Court ruled in the regulator’s favour, an existing industry agreement meant all Danish internet service providers had to implement the block. BetXpert, citing Teleindustrien data shared with Danish broadcaster TV 2, confirmed Polymarket has appealed the ruling.
Polymarket issued a statement calling prediction markets “an important innovation within the financial digital market,” saying it does not take a position in any market or profit from any outcome. That argument, platform versus gambling product, is what the company is making across multiple countries at the same time.
The Minister’s Words Were Sharper Than Usual
Tax and Growth Minister Jakob Engel-Schmidt kept nothing back. His statement targeted Polymarket’s markets on war and political violence with unusual directness.
“A human life is not a betting slip. And war should not be something you can sit at home on the sofa and speculate on to make money,” he said. He added: “We’re talking about people losing their lives. About families losing their loved ones. About wars that destroy entire societies. And then someone sits there and says, ‘What if we could bet on when it happens?’ It’s crazy.”
Not all Danish politicians agreed. Liberal Alliance spokesperson Steffen Frolund compared prediction markets to the insurance industry. “There is a party on one side who takes some risk for an outcome, and a party on the other side who is exempt from the risk of an outcome. So it is actually very comparable,” he said.
The debate in Denmark has never been purely regulatory. Specific trades on the platform have raised questions about whether users with inside information profited from political and military outcomes before those events became public; a concern that made Danish politicians restless long before any court ruling arrived.
Denmark’s Enforcement Numbers Explain Why This Was Coming
Spillemyndigheden is moving faster. It blocked 334 sites for online gambling that are not legal in 2025, compared to 162 in 2024, almost doubling the number of blocked sites within just a year. Out of 695 sites being examined by Spillemyndigheden, 36 of them
DNS blocking produces results. After 178 sites were blocked in June 2025, traffic to those domains fell by 34% over the following six months. The August 2026 batch brings the total blocked since 2012 to 870. Polymarket now sits on that list alongside six Ice Casino domains, five Everygame domains, and eight Leon domains; established offshore brands that scatter across multiple web addresses in an attempt to stay ahead of enforcement.
Europe Had Already Been Moving Before Denmark Acted
On 17 June 2026, nine gambling regulators from Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Switzerland signed a joint declaration targeting unlicensed prediction market platforms, the first time European regulators had acted as a bloc on this issue rather than each country deciding alone.
Polymarket was blocked by France’s ISPs on 16 July, since their geoblocking of transactions made from France had been circumvented. In June, according to the national gambling regulator, the Autorité nationale des jeux registered 578,751 visits from France, out of which 205,057 were unique, despite some blocking measures being enforced. The Dutch Gambling Authority ordered Polymarket to stop its activities in February 2026, and threatened weekly fines amounting to €420,000 should Polymarket not obey the order. Polymarket was included in the blacklist of Belgium. In May, Spain applied a temporary ban on it.
What the Danish Ruling Actually Settles?
The ruling establishes something practical for every prediction market operator watching from outside Denmark. A platform does not need to translate its interface into Danish, accept Danish kroner, or set up local customer service to cross the legal targeting threshold. It is enough that regulators can demonstrate to a court that the platform was engaging Danish users in ways that qualify as market targeting under Danish gambling law.
Spillemyndigheden has also updated its cooperation with Teleindustrien so mirror or clone sites can be blocked without a new court order, once the original has already been ruled illegal. That removes a delay tactic offshore operators have used repeatedly.
The broader legal question, whether prediction markets are gambling products or financial instruments, stays open. Polymarket acquired CFTC-licensed exchange QCEX in 2025, giving it federal oversight in the United States. European regulators have not accepted that classification. The European Securities and Markets Authority clarified in July 2026 that event contracts on economic underlyings are financial instruments, but contracts on elections, sport, and political events remain subject to national gambling law. That is where Polymarket’s core products sit.
Expert Analysis
The most revealing detail in this story is the pace of the reversal. In February, Spillemyndigheden said publicly it could not act. Five months later, it had a court order. That gap shows how fast “we are watching you” becomes “you are blocked.”
Polymarket’s appeals in Denmark and France will test whether a platform can successfully argue that operating globally without deliberate local adaptation is legally different from targeting a specific market. When those answers come, every operator in the sector will need to be paying attention.
Explore more:
Share
5 views
