The UK Advertising Standards Authority has banned a BOYLE Sports promotion after finding that it encouraged betting behaviour that could lead to financial harm.
This ruling concerned the operator’s “Bank Builder Jackpot” campaign, which ran between February and March 2026. Customers could receive up to £60 in free bets and a share of a £10,000 weekly jackpot by betting across four to seven days each week.
Furthermore, the ASA upheld the complaint and found its promotion breached CAP Code rules on socially responsible gambling advertising. Even at the lowest reward level, customers had to bet on four days out of seven. The largest rewards required daily gambling for four consecutive weeks.
BOYLE Sports argued customers retained flexibility
BOYLE Sports said the promotion was “aimed at customers with varying levels of normal betting activity” and did not require everyone to pursue the highest reward tier.
Customers could qualify by betting across five, six or seven days without participating during all four weeks. The operator said customers did not need to opt in, increase stakes or make additional deposits.
Rewards were credited automatically, while BOYLE Sports described the advertisement as factual. Its data showed 2.5% of qualifying customers reached the seven-day tier in any week, while 0.5% participated on all 28 days.
The operator also argued that the average number of weekly betting days among qualifying customers had not increased much compared with the period before the campaign.
ASA found the promotion created financial harm risks
The regulator accepted that most customers avoided the maximum route but found the campaign encouraged gambling on “more days of a promotional week than not”. Customers pursuing the maximum benefits would need to place qualifying bets every day for four weeks and stake at least £280 to receive shares of the weekly jackpot.
“We understood that BOYLE Sports held customer data that showed the maximum route of betting every day in a promotional week was not typical of customers who qualified for the promotion; neither was a pattern of betting every day of every week for all four weeks,” the ASA said.
“We understood that BOYLE Sports also held data that they had interpreted as showing that the number of days in a week that qualifying customers bet on average had not increased significantly, compared to a period before the promotion.
“Notwithstanding that, we considered that the mechanics of the promotion which encouraged frequent and repetitive gambling on four to seven days out of every week, over a four-week period, including the requirement to use the free bets in the subsequent weeks to which they were accumulated, could lead to financial harm.
“For those reasons, we concluded that the ad encouraged behaviour that was socially irresponsible or could lead to financial harm. The ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 16.3 and 16.3.1 (Gambling).”
Ruling may bring closer scrutiny of major campaigns
This decision follows a compliant period for gambling advertising. ASA data showed one confirmed industry breach between July and November 2025, with 96.2% of reviewed gambling marketing receiving approval. However, that period was quiet in the sporting calendar.
The BOYLE Sports promotion ran through the Cheltenham Festival, when betting advertising and customer bonuses often peaks. Also, the ASA has warned that it is monitoring campaigns linked to the 2026 World Cup.
As the regulator reviews more advertising connected to major sporting events, other operators could face scrutiny over promotions rewarding repeated betting or requiring customers to gamble across several days.
Expert Opinion
The recent ASA ruling against BOYLE Sports serves as a critical signal to the industry regarding the creation of promotional campaigns around major sporting events. This move will discourage operators from encouraging players to gamble for extended periods.
Companies
Prediction Markets