Several organizations including Social and Promotional Games Association (SPGA) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have united to oppose California’s proposed legislation on daily fantasy sports and sweepstakes. The bill, AB 831, was introduced by Attorney General Rob Bonta and is set for a Senate hearing on July 15, 2025.

Alongside the SPGA and ACLU, other members of the coalition include the American Transaction Processors Coalition, the Association of National Advertisers, Californians United for a Responsible Budget, Virtual Gaming World, and the Social Gaming Leadership Alliance (SGLA). This coalition claims the bill threatens legal promotional models and could impact businesses and consumers.

Concerns Over Vague Language and Legislative Impact

The SPGA released a statement on its website outlining major concerns about the bill, especially the use of vague language creating legal uncertainty. The group argues that AB 831 lacks clear information on the legality of sweepstakes, which are currently allowed in California.

According to existing state regulations, sweepstakes remain legal provided they are not similar to illegal lotteries and compliant with relevant consumer laws. The new bill aims to outlaw these types of promotional activities. Attorney General Bonta has previously voiced strong opposition to DFS and sweepstakes, but he’s now pushing for a formal ban in the state.

Earlier Legal Efforts to Stop the Bill Unsuccessful

Before AB 831 was officially introduced, DFS operator Underdog, attempted to stop its progress through the courts. The company filed for an injunction and a temporary restraining order, arguing that the bill would cause harm and potentially violate constitutional protections. However, the request was denied, and the legislation continued its course through the Senate.

Underdog’s legal efforts highlighted growing industry anxiety around the potential implications of AB 831. Industry groups argue that the proposed changes could disrupt long-standing legal activities and create confusion for businesses and consumers. Critics say the bill doesn’t clearly distinguish between unlawful gambling and compliant promotional practices.

Diverse Coalition Highlights Shared Concern

A spokesperson for the SPGA highlighted in a statement, “The SPGA is proud to stand alongside the ACLU, the Association of National Advertisers, and other partners in voicing concerns about AB 831. This diverse coalition, including civil liberties advocates, leading businesses, and industry groups, reflects a shared belief that the bill, as written, could have unintended consequences for lawful promotional practices without offering clear consumer protections.”

With the Senate hearing underway, opponents of AB 831 hope their collective voice will prompt lawmakers to reconsider the bill’s language or withdraw it.